| U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION |
|
TABLE 1 |
|
|
|
|
| OFFICE OF
SPECIAL EDUCATION |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| AND
REHABILITATIVE SERVICES |
|
REPORT OF CHILDREN RECEIVING |
|
|
OMB NO.: 1820-0557 |
|
| OFFICE OF
SPECIAL EDUCATION |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| PROGRAMS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EARLY INTERVENTION SERVICES IN ACCORDANCE WITH PART C |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CT - CONNECTICUT |
|
|
|
|
Date between October 1, 2009 - December 1, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SECTION D (optional) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| CUMULATIVE NUMBER OF INFANTS AND TODDLERS WHO RECEIVED EARLY
INTERVENTION SERVICES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| FROM |
12/02/08 |
TO |
12/01/09 |
(SPECIFY EXACT DATES) |
|
|
| |
|
|
AGE: birth through 2 |
|
| NUMBER OF
INFANTS AND TODDLERS |
9287 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Connecticut
estimated the race/ethnicity for 67 children who had an unknown
race/ethnicity or multiple race/ethnicities. |
|
| As requested in
an email on January 21, 2010 at 12:28 PM from Newton Piper, Connecticut had
already prepared the Part C |
|
| 2009 Child
Count and Settings data based on instructions and forms available prior to
OMB approval. |
|
| The state's
data may depart from the instructions provided in the 2009 Table 1 and Table
2 because children who were exited from |
|
| Part C based on
"Attempts to Contact Unsuccessful" (Table 3, row 10) are not
counted as having an active IFSP on Dec. 1, 2009. |
|
| The rationale
for this possible departure is that "Attempts to Contact
Unsuccessful" was and is a valid exit status on Table 3. |
|
| There are
children/families counted as having an active IFSP on Dec. 1, 2009 that EIS
Providers are not able to contact.
They have not yet been |
|
| exited based on
"Attempts to Contact Unsuccessful" because the local EIS providers
are still attempting to contact them.
Connecticut has |
|
| procedures
about steps EIS Providers should follow prior to exiting a child/family based
on "Attempts to Contact Unsuccessful". The |
|
| IFSPs for
families of children under age the age of 3 who have recently exited can be
"reactivated" or the child may be re-evaluated |
|
| once contact
has been re-established depending on the individual circumstances for each
child and family. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|