|
Focused Monitoring Data
Connecticut has developed a focused monitoring system. Focused
Monitoring is defined as:
A process
that purposefully selects priority areas to examine for
compliance/results while not specifically examining other areas
for compliance to maximize resources, emphasize important
variables, and increase the probability of improved results. -
NCSEAM Advisory Board.
During
2008, the Focused Monitoring System was evaluated by Kristin
Reedy, Ed.D. and Vicki Hornus, M.S., from Learning Innovations
at WESTED. Below are links to the complete report and the
executive summary which were presented to the State ICC on
12/1/08.
The
Complete Report (38 pages + 7 Appendices)
The Executive Summary (18 pages)
Back in 2005, three measures were selected by a
group of "stakeholders" that included parents, service providers
and other agency representatives. (The
State Interagency Coordinating Council forms the base of the
stakeholders group.) This information is presented to help
increase awareness about how each program compares with other
programs of a similar size. The measures are considered to be
important for high quality early intervention. Programs are ranked
on each measure and the programs that are the lowest performing
are selected for on-site monitoring visits. After each visit a
summary report is written.
The reports
summarize:
the reason that the program was selected,
the hypotheses or ideas about why this program was ranked
low in that area,
what happened during the visit,
the findings as related to the hypotheses, and
any measures that were found to be out of compliance with
State or Federal law.
To view the report
for a program that was selected, click on the program name
below.
As with any
information that comes primarily from an electronic database, the ranks
should be read carefully, without placing too much value on any
single number. The performance of any program should
always be compared to the average for the group and the state.
These averages along with other information about each program
can be found on the each program's profile.
Programs are
grouped by size
This table shows the
small, medium and large groupings that were decided based upon
the number of children enrolled in each program.
Child Find: Initial IFSP's are timely and
appropriate based on the eligibility evaluation and the family's
concerns, priorities and resources.
This table shows the
percent of Individualized Family Service Plan (IFSP) meetings
that were held within 45 calendar days from the day that the
referral was made to Child Development Infoline.
Meetings that were delayed due to family request are
included and counted as being held on time.
Service Delivery:
All
families and children receive quality early intervention
services.
This table shows the percent of families that received all
NEW services listed on their IFSP within 45 days from the
IFSP meeting. A point in time analysis was used selecting
all children with IFSPs on 12/1/07. New
Services that were delayed due to family request are
included and counted as being held on time.
Transition:
Families and children have a smooth transition to the next
program at age three.
This table shows the percent of
transition conferences that were held no more than 9 months ans
at least 90 days before age 3 for children who were found
eligible for Birth to Three who were referred to their local
school district (and children who had not yet been referred.) Conferences that were delayed due to family
request are included and counted as being held on time.
Last Updated 8/14/09
|